My Right-Wing Reactionary Case for Shutting the Border
The New Center: A Wednesday Newsletter From Sohrab Ahmari
On Thursday, I took part in a debate on immigration organized by The Free Press at the Majestic Theatre in Dallas. The formal motion was “The United States should shut its borders.” Ann Coulter and I were for the motion. Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks and Reason’s Nick Gillespie represented the open-borders side. Bari Weiss moderated. Here’s my opening statement—
I’ll tell you two things about myself that are relevant to this important debate. The first is that I’m a legal immigrant to the United States and a proud American by choice. And the second: I believe that the national interest demands that we shut down the border to the mass movement of millions of low-wage economic migrants masquerading as asylum-seekers.
Why do I take this position? It’s because years ago, I started reading right-wing reactionary pundits and thinkers. I’m talking about people like, well, Ann Coulter here. In one of her books years ago, Ann wrote, “Many of the worst-off native-born Americans are hurt by immigration,” especially immigration from Latin America. Because such newcomers “have much less education than the average U.S. worker, they increase the supply of less-skilled labor, driving down the wages of the worst-paid Americans.” Ann also pointed out that “low-skill immigrants threaten to unravel [our] safety net.”
Oh wait, actually, it wasn’t Ann Coulter who penned these words. It was the progressive economist Paul Krugman, writing in The New York Times in 2006.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Compact’s Substack to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.